Follow 

Share

The AMS landscape is evolving rapidly. With the ever-changing nature of technology, older comments can sometimes provide a skewed view to the person seeking feedback. Archived reviews are more than 60 months old, and aren't counted towards the average five star ratings or percent recommended.

This system was probably good in 2005

Submitted Nov. 29, 2018
Customer Service
2
Does your AMS vendor respond to your organization's requests in a timely and thorough way?
Ease of Use
2
Reliability
3
Customization
1
Membership Size: 
1,001-5,000
Industry Type: 
Construction
Organization Type: 
Individual Membership
Primary Job Function: 
Executive Management, Strategic Planning, Governance
Number of Years Using the AMS: 
4-7 years
Thank Reviewer (0)  
Report Review  

I did not choose this system, but I do have to use it...and it is a challenge. Very old interface that really limits admins ability to make it user friendly for today's customers. The IZENDA reports tool that they offer in the system is quite powerful but is also quite old and difficult to use.