Follow 

Contact

Share

The AMS landscape is evolving rapidly. With the ever-changing nature of technology, older comments can sometimes provide a skewed view to the person seeking feedback. Archived reviews are more than 60 months old, and aren't counted towards the average five star ratings or percent recommended.

Timberlake was a Mistake

Customer Service
1
Does your AMS vendor respond to your organization's requests in a timely and thorough way?
Ease of Use
1
Reliability
1
Customization
1
Primary Job Function: 
Operations, Administration
Number of Years Using the AMS: 
1-3 years
We are a fairly small organization and our membership is not very complex. We have individual members and just a handful of organizational memberships. However, we find the system very difficult to use. Event setup and tracking is cumbersome, the accounting structure doesnÕt work with how our systems work (even though we were promised this would be fixed and it never has) and customer support is very poor. HereÕs one example of the poor service: Timberlake switched over to a new events module without informing us during the end of our early-bird registration for our annual meeting, we lost a weekendÕs worth of registrations and had lots of angry phone calls waiting for us when we opened on Monday. TimberlakeÕs response was, we run updates all the time and we canÕt always keep track of which clients are currently using the current/old modules. Timberlake was bought by a company called Naylor. They seem to be trying to improve customer service but we havenÕt noticed a difference.