Follow 

Contact

Share

The AMS landscape is evolving rapidly. With the ever-changing nature of technology, older comments can sometimes provide a skewed view to the person seeking feedback. Archived reviews are more than 60 months old, and aren't counted towards the average five star ratings or percent recommended.

Powerhouse AMS

Submitted Mar. 23, 2018
Customer Service
2
Does your AMS vendor respond to your organization's requests in a timely and thorough way?
Ease of Use
2
Reliability
4
Customization
5
Membership Size: 
101-500
Industry Type: 
Printing / Publications / Media
Organization Type: 
Trade Membership
Primary Job Function: 
Technology
Number of Years Using the AMS: 
8-11 years
Thank Reviewer (0)  
Report Review  

We are currently using iMIS 20. While I understand and appreciate the power behind the application and all the available functionality, we as an organization find the application to be difficult to use and maintain. In part is the cost. While the application already had a hefty price tag, when ASI modified their structure this year, it really pushed our association out the door. The other issue with the system is having to hire a database administrator to do the work that we would prefer to do in house. If we were a larger association with growth potential and could afford the development of the system, it would be a great application to have. We cannot justify the cost.